CsPbBr₃/ZnO VA CsPbBr₃/TiO₂ GIBRID KOMPOZITLARIDA INTERFEYS ZARYAD TASHUVCHILARI DINAMIKASI VA OPTIK XOSSALARNING SHAKLLANISH MEXANIZMLARI

Mualliflar

  • Abbos Yusupov Author
  • Dilnavoz Kamalova Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/ydif-y2026v2i18/n03

Kalit so‘zlar:

CsPbBr₃, ZnO, TiO₂, heterostruktura, zaryad transferi, ichki elektr maydon, fotoluminessensiya, TRPL, rekombinatsiya, S-sxema.

Annotasiya

Ishda CsPbBr₃ kvant nuqtalarining ZnO va TiO₂ oksid yarimo‘tkazgichlari bilan hosil qilgan heterointerfeyslarida fotoqo‘zg‘algan zaryad tashuvchilar dinamikasi qiyosiy tahlil qilindi. Tahlilning asosiy mezonlari sifatida energetik zonalar moslashuvi, interfeysdagi zaryad qayta taqsimlanishi, fotoluminessensiya (PL) so‘nishi va vaqt bo‘yicha ajratilgan fotoluminessensiya (TRPL) ko‘rsatkichlari tanlandi. CsPbBr₃/ZnO tizimida elektron ekstraksiyasi va issiq tashuvchilar kinetikasi, CsPbBr₃/TiO₂ tizimida esa ichki elektr maydon bilan boshqariladigan S-sxemali zaryad transferi asosiy mexanizmlar sifatida qaraldi. Natijalar PL intensivligining o‘zgarishini alohida ko‘rsatkich sifatida emas, balki rekombinatsiya tezligi, sirt nuqsonlari va interfeys morfologiyasi bilan birgalikda talqin qilish zarurligini ko‘rsatadi. Shu asosda ZnO va TiO₂ ning CsPbBr₃ optik javobiga ta’sirini ajratib beruvchi eksperimental tekshiruv sxemasi taklif qilindi.

Manbalar

1. Protesescu L., Yakunin S., Bodnarchuk M. I. va boshq. Nanocrystals of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskites (CsPbX₃, X = Cl, Br, and I): Novel Optoelectronic Materials Showing Bright Emission with Wide Color Gamut. Nano Letters, 2015, 15, 3692–3696. DOI: 10.1021/nl5048779.

2. Swarnkar A., Marshall A. R., Sanehira E. M. va boshq. Colloidal CsPbBr₃ Perovskite Nanocrystals: Luminescence beyond Traditional Quantum Dots. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55, 2382–2386. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201508276.

3. Shamsi J., Urban A. S., Imran M., De Trizio L., Manna L. Metal Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals: Synthesis, Post-Synthesis Modifications, and Their Optical Properties. Chemical Reviews, 2019, 119, 3296–3348. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00644.

4. Nagal V., Kumar V., Rahman S. va boshq. Insight into Hot Carrier Kinetics of CsPbBr₃/ZnO Heterostructures for Photodetector Application. ACS Applied Optical Materials, 2023, 1, 779–787. DOI: 10.1021/acsaom.2c00201.

5. Xu F., Meng K., Cheng B. va boshq. Unique S-scheme Heterojunctions in Self-Assembled TiO₂/CsPbBr₃ Hybrids for CO₂ Photoreduction. Nature Communications, 2020, 11, 4613. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18350-7.

6. In-situ TiO₂-Coated CsPbBr₃ Quantum Dots with Enhanced Stability, Photoluminescence Quantum Yields, and Charge Transport Properties. Ceramics International, 2022, 48, 32504–32512. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.196.

7. Ding Y., Zhao Y., Deng Z. va boshq. CsPbBr₃/TiO₂ Z-Type Heterojunction for Rhodamine B Catalysis and Efficient Photodetectors. Chemical Physics Letters, 2024, 838, 141452. DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2024.141452.

8. Jiang C., Wang J., Wang Y., Du L. Mechanisms of Band Alignment and Charge Transfer in Interfacial Termination-Dependent Heterojunctions between CsPbBr₃ and TiO₂, SnO₂, and ZnO Electron-Transport Layers. Computational Materials Science, 2026, 273, 114973. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2026.114973.

9. Nuket P., Akaishi Y., Yoshimura G., Vas-Umnuay P., Kida T. Enhanced Interfacial Charge Transfer between CsPbBr₃ Quantum Dots and Surface-Modified TiO₂/FTO Photoanodes for Photocurrent Generation. Materials Today Nano, 2022, 18, 100174. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtnano.2022.100174.

10. Dong Z., Zhang Z., Jiang Y., Chu Y., Xu J. Embedding CsPbBr₃ Perovskite Quantum Dots into Mesoporous TiO₂ Beads as an S-Scheme Heterojunction for CO₂ Photoreduction. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 433, 133762. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133762.

##submission.downloads##

Nashr qilingan

2026-09-28

Qanday ko'rsatish

Yusupov , A., & Kamalova, D. (2026). CsPbBr₃/ZnO VA CsPbBr₃/TiO₂ GIBRID KOMPOZITLARIDA INTERFEYS ZARYAD TASHUVCHILARI DINAMIKASI VA OPTIK XOSSALARNING SHAKLLANISH MEXANIZMLARI. YANGI DAVR ILM-FANI: INSON UCHUN INNOVATSION G‘OYA VA YECHIMLAR, 2(18), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.47390/ydif-y2026v2i18/n03