5G NR SLICE‘LARI TRAFIGINI TAVSIFLASH UCHUN EHTIMOLIY TAQSIMOTLARNI TANLASHNING QIYOSIY TAHLILI

Авторы

  • Aygul Seytnazarova Автор
  • Rustem Jalelov Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/ydif-y2026v2i19/n04

Ключевые слова:

trafik modeli, kesilgan Pareto, Bernulli, murakkab Puasson, Hurst parametri, variatsiya koeffitsienti, G/G/1, network slicing.

Аннотация

5G NR tarmoqlarida eMBB, URLLC va mMTC slice’lari o‘rtasida radiokanal o‘tkazish polosasini taqsimlash natijasi trafikning statistik modeliga bevosita bog‘liq. Mavjud modellarda trafik ko‘pincha Puasson yoki real o‘lchovlarga to‘liq mos kelmaydigan taqsimotlar bilan ifodalanadi. Tezisda bitta uzatish intervalida (TTI) keladigan paketlar sonini tavsiflovchi ehtimoliy taqsimotlarni tanlash masalasi 17 ta ilmiy manba asosida qiyosiy tahlil qilindi. Sharhlarda keltirilgan standart modellar, real tarmoq o‘lchovlari va nazariy natijalar qiyoslanib, har bir slice uchun nomzod taqsimot hamda G/G/1 navbat modeliga kiritiladigan variatsiya koeffitsientining analitik ifodasi keltirildi. eMBB uchun kesilgan Pareto, URLLC uchun siyrak yuklama rejimidagi Bernulli approksimatsiyasi, mMTC uchun esa murakkab Puasson taqsimotlari asoslandi va ularning o‘tkazish polosasiga ta’siri baholandi. Pareto va Hurst parametri o‘rtasidagi bog‘lanishning evristik xususiyati, natijaning kesish chegarasiga sezgirligi, murakkab Puasson jarayoni o‘z-o‘ziga o‘xshashlikni emas, balki portlashlilikni ifodalashi hamda ikki momentli approksimatsiya uzoq muddatli bog‘liqlikni hisobga olmasligi ko‘rsatildi. Olingan ifodalar sun’iy intellekt asosidagi neyron tarmoq approksimatori uchun o‘quv ma’lumotlarini shakllantirishda qo‘llanilishi mumkin.

Библиографические ссылки

1. Abou El Hassan A., El Mehdi A., Saber M. NB-IoT and LTE-M towards massive MTC: Complete performance evaluation for 5G mMTC // Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. – 2021. – Vol. 23, No. 1. – P. 308–320.

2. AlQahtani S.A. Cooperative-aware radio resource allocation scheme for 5G network slicing in cloud radio access networks // Sensors. – 2023. – Vol. 23. – 5111.

3. Amirsaidov U., Qodirov A. Model of optimal distribution of network resources with constraints on quality of service indicators // Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics. – 2023. – Vol. 12, No. 2. – P. 835–842.

4. Amirsaidov U., Turumbetov B. Model for distributing radio channel bandwidth among 5G NR network slices considering traffic self-similarity // Proc. OPTIMA-2025. – IEEE, 2025. – P. 556–561.

5. Anand A., de Veciana G., Shakkottai S. Joint scheduling of URLLC and eMBB traffic in 5G wireless networks // IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. – 2020. – Vol. 28, No. 2. – P. 477–490.

6. Anand A., de Veciana G. Resource allocation and HARQ optimization for URLLC traffic in 5G wireless networks // IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. – 2018. – Vol. 36, No. 11. – P. 2411–2421.

7. Becchi M. From Poisson processes to self-similarity: a survey of network traffic models. – Washington University in St. Louis, CSE 567, 2006.

8. Chen S., Zhao J. The requirements, challenges, and technologies for 5G of terrestrial mobile telecommunication // IEEE Communications Magazine. – 2014. – Vol. 52, No. 5. – P. 36–43.

9. Feng D., She C., Ying K. et al. Towards ultra-reliable low-latency communications: Typical scenarios, possible solutions, and open issues // IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine. – 2019. – Vol. 14, No. 2. – P. 94–102.

10. Lee D.-S., Chang C.-S., Zhang R., Lee M.-P. Resource allocation for URLLC and eMBB traffic in uplink wireless networks // Performance Evaluation. – 2023. – Vol. 161. – Art. 102353.

11. Mitzenmacher M. Dynamic models for file sizes and double Pareto distributions // Internet Mathematics. – 2004. – Vol. 1, No. 3. – P. 305–333.

12. Navarro-Ortiz J., Romero-Diaz P., Sendra S. et al. A survey on 5G usage scenarios and traffic models // IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. – 2020. – Vol. 22, No. 2. – P. 905–929.

13. Ratasuk R., Mangalvedhe N., Bhatoolaul D., Ghosh A. LTE-M evolution towards 5G massive MTC // IEEE Globecom Workshops. – 2017. – P. 1–6.

14. Ruiz-Guirola D.E., López O.L.A., Montejo-Sánchez S. Modeling IoT traffic patterns: Insights from a statistical analysis of an MTC dataset // Expert Systems with Applications. – 2025. – Vol. 272. – Art. 126726.

15. Soos G., Ficzere D., Varga P. Towards traffic identification and modeling for 5G application use-cases // Electronics. – 2020. – Vol. 9, No. 4. – 640.

16. Taqqu M.S., Willinger W., Sherman R. Proof of a fundamental result in self-similar traffic modeling // ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. – 1997. – Vol. 27, No. 2. – P. 5–23.

17. Whitt W. Approximations for the GI/G/m queue // Production and Operations Management. – 1993. – Vol. 2, No. 2. – P. 114–161.

Опубликован

2026-10-13

Как цитировать

Seytnazarova , A., & Jalelov, R. (2026). 5G NR SLICE‘LARI TRAFIGINI TAVSIFLASH UCHUN EHTIMOLIY TAQSIMOTLARNI TANLASHNING QIYOSIY TAHLILI. НАУКА НОВОГО ВРЕМЕНИ: ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ И РЕШЕНИЯ ДЛЯ ЧЕЛОВЕКА, 2(19), 21-24. https://doi.org/10.47390/ydif-y2026v2i19/n04