ORGANIZATIONAL-ECONOMIC MECHANISM FOR MANAGING FAMILY ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE AND DIRECTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF UZBEKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/ydif-y2026v2i18/n15Keywords:
family business, family enterprise, organizational-economic mechanism, management, costs, strategic planning, digitalization, innovation, corporate governance, professional management.Abstract
This article examines the organizational-economic mechanism for managing the operations of family enterprises from both theoretical and practical perspectives. It presents a comparative study of family business models in Germany, Japan, the USA, Italy, and China, focusing on their organizational characteristics, management methods, cost management approaches, innovation activities, and state support mechanisms. Based on the research findings, key elements of foreign experience applicable to the context of Uzbekistan have been systematized. Scientific and practical proposals have been developed to advance management accounting, digital monitoring, strategic cost management, professional management, generational succession, and innovative financing within family enterprises.
References
1. Rovelli P., Ferasso M., De Massis A., Kraus S. Thirty years of research in family business journals: Status quo and future directions. Journal of Family Business Strategy. 2022. Vol. 13(3). 100422.
2. Dinh T.Q., Calabrò A. Asian family firms through corporate governance and institutions: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2019. Vol. 21(1). P. 50–75.
3. Eddleston K.A., Kellermanns F.W., Kidwell R.E. Managing family members: How monitoring and collaboration affect extra-role behavior in family firms. Human Resource Management. 2018. Vol. 57(5). P. 957–977.
4. Herrero I., Hughes M. When family social capital is too much of a good thing. Journal of Family Business Strategy. 2019. Vol. 10(3). 100271.
5. Madison K., Daspit J.J., Turner K., Kellermanns F.W. Family firm human resource practices: Investigating the effects of professionalization and bifurcation bias on performance. Journal of Business Research. 2018. Vol. 84. P. 327–336.
6. Madison K., Holt D.T., Kellermanns F.W., Ranft A.L. Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review. 2016. Vol. 29(1). P. 65–93.
7. Michiels A., Uhlaner L., Dekker J. The effect of family business professionalization on dividend payout. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2017. Vol. 24(4). P. 971–990.
8. Yamanoi J., Asaba S. The impact of family ownership on establishment and ownership modes in foreign direct investment. Global Strategy Journal. 2018. Vol. 8(1). P. 106–135.
9. Zaman R., Jain T., Samara G., Jamali D. Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: Mapping the interface. Business & Society. 2022. Vol. 61(3). P. 690–752.
10. Robertsson H., Zellweger T., Klein M. Global Family Business Index 2023. EY and University of St.Gallen, 2023.
This work is licensed under a 