OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE FACTORS INFLUENCING THE FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF JUDGES' LEGAL CONSCIOUSNESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/ydif-y2025v1i7/n11Keywords:
: legal consciousness, objective factors, subjective factors, legislation, judicial system, professional skills, ethical values, psychological factors, judicial independence, jurisprudence, views of foreign scholars, polemics.Abstract
This article analyzes the objective and subjective factors influencing the formation and development of judges' professional legal consciousness. Objective factors include the legislative framework, the institutional structure of the judicial system, and the socio-economic environment. Subjective factors encompass judges' level of education, personal ethical values, professional skills, and psychological characteristics. The article presents a polemical discussion based on the theoretical views of foreign legal scholars, particularly Ronald Dworkin, H.L.A. Hart, Lon Fuller, and Jerome Frank, regarding legal consciousness and judicial activity. The analysis emphasizes the importance of improving the education system, ensuring judicial independence, and strengthening ethical norms to enhance judges' legal consciousness.
References
1. Oʼzbekiston Prezidenti Sh.Mirziyoev, 2019 yildagi sud-huquq sohasiga oid yigʼilishdagi maʼruza;
2. Ilyos Tultev, «Huquqiy ong va uning ijtimoiy ahamiyati», 2017 yil, Toshkent;
3. Jerome Frank. Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Coward-McCann, 1930;
4. Уголовное право России. Общая часть : курс лекций / А.Я. Гришко, А.А.; Волчкова, М.А. Ершов, М.А. Кириллов и др.; под ред. А.П. Кузнецова; Е.Е. Черных. М., 2018. Серия: Уголовное право;
5. bullaw.enu.kz- Saktaganova Indira, Candidate of Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Constitutional and Civil Law, илмий электрон мақола;
6. Ivanova, A. (2020). The Role of Legal Culture in Shaping Judicial Decisions in Democratic Societies. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 5(2), 123-130.;
7. Roberts, D., et al. (2019). Media Transparency and Judicial Independence: An Empirical Analysis. European Proceedings, 4(1), 87-95;
8. Peters, M. (2018). Judicial Training and the Development of Legal Consciousness in Europe. European Journal of Legal Studies, 10(3), 45-59;
9. Smirnova, E. (2017). Professional Development of Judges in Russia: Ethical and Practical Perspectives. Russian Law Review, 5(2), 120-135;
10. Jerome Frank, Law and the Modern Mind (1930);
11. Rodríguez & Sánchez, Journal of Judicial Psychology, 2020, Madrid;
12. Frank, J. (1930). Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Coward-McCann;
13. González, I., & Martinez, L. (2021). Psychological Resilience and Legal Decision-Making under Pressure. Spanish Journal of Judicial Psychology https://journals.copmadrid.org;
This work is licensed under a 