METHODOLOGY FOR PREVENTING PRAGMATIC ERRORS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE USE OF SPEECH ACTS IN ENGLISH

Authors

  • Zeboxon Musayeva Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/ydif-y2026v2i19/n34

Keywords:

speech act, pragmatic error, English language, pragmatic competence, communicative situation, politeness, context, indirect speech act, methodology.

Abstract

This thesis explores a methodology for preventing pragmatic errors through the appropriate use of speech acts in English in accordance with communicative situations. The study analyzes the linguopragmatic features of speech acts such as requests, offers, refusals, apologies, expressions of gratitude, advice, and expressions of agreement. The main causes of pragmatic errors are identified as the direct transfer of native-language norms into English, failure to consider social distance and status, the selection of expressions inappropriate to the level of formality, and the misinterpretation of indirect expressions. The research is based on comparative-pragmatic analysis, contextual analysis, pedagogical observation, and the modeling of communicative situations. The findings indicate that teaching speech acts in conjunction with context, communicative purpose, interlocutor relationships, and cultural norms contributes to the development of pragmatic competence. The proposed methodological approach integrates the stages of comprehension, comparison, modeling, practical application, and reflective assessment.

References

1. Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words. — 2nd ed. — Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1975. — 168 p.

2. Searle J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1969. — 203 p.

3. Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1987. — 345 p.

4. Leech G. N. Principles of Pragmatics. — London ; New York : Longman, 1983. — 250 p.

5. Yule G. Pragmatics. — Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1996. — 138 p.

6. Thomas J. Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure // Applied Linguistics. — 1983. — Vol. 4, No. 2. — P. 91–112. — DOI: 10.1093/applin/4.2.91.

7. Kasper G., Rose K. R. Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. — Oxford : Blackwell Publishing, 2002. — 364 p.

8. Taguchi N. Context, Individual Differences and Pragmatic Competence. — Bristol : Multilingual Matters, 2012. — 336 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-13

How to Cite

Musayeva , Z. (2026). METHODOLOGY FOR PREVENTING PRAGMATIC ERRORS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE USE OF SPEECH ACTS IN ENGLISH. SCIENCE OF THE NEW ERA: INNOVATIVE IDEAS AND SOLUTIONS FOR HUMANITY, 2(19), 166-168. https://doi.org/10.47390/ydif-y2026v2i19/n34