METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING METHODOLOGICAL COMPETENCE OF FUTURE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS IN THE CONDITIONS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/ydif-y2026v2i10/n16Keywords:
inclusive education, special education teacher, methodological competence, methodology, individual approach, remedial education, pedagogical diagnostics, reflection.Abstract
This thesis discusses the methodology for developing methodological competence of future special educators in the conditions of inclusive education. Inclusive education requires a special educator not only theoretical knowledge, but also the skills to work with children with different developmental characteristics, design an individual educational path, organize corrective and developmental classes, and adapt the pedagogical process. Therefore, the development of methodological competence in future special educators is an important component of professional training. The thesis analyzes the conditions for the formation of methodological competence based on competency-based, person-oriented, active and reflexive approaches. The methodological importance of practical exercises, case analysis, pedagogical observation, individual educational program design, differential assignments, and reflective assessment is also substantiated.
References
1. Выготский Л.С. Основы дефектологии. — СПб.: Лань, 2003. — 654 с.
2. Назарова Н.М. Специальная педагогика. — М.: Академия, 2010. — 400 с.
3. Малофеев Н.Н. Специальное образование в меняющемся мире. — М.: Просвещение, 2018. — 319 с.
4. Зимняя И.А. Ключевые компетенции — новая парадигма результата образования // Высшее образование сегодня. — 2003. — № 5. — С. 34–42.
5. Хуторской А.В. Компетентностный подход в обучении. — М.: Эйдос, 2013. — 73 с.
6. Митчелл Д. Эффективные педагогические технологии специального и инклюзивного образования. — М.: Перспектива, 2011. — 138 с.
7. UNESCO. Guidelines for Inclusion: Ensuring Access to Education for All. — Paris: UNESCO, 2005. — 37 p.
8. Florian L., Black-Hawkins K. Exploring inclusive pedagogy // British Educational Research Journal. — 2011. — Vol. 37, № 5. — P. 813–828.

This work is licensed under a