OILAVIY KORXONALAR FAOLIYATINI BOSHQARISHNING TASHKILIY-IQTISODIY MEXANIZMI: XORIJ TAJRIBASI VA O‘ZBEKISTON SHAROITIDA UNI TAKOMILLASHTIRISH YO‘NALISHLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/ydif-y2026v2i18/n15Kalit so‘zlar:
oilaviy biznes, oilaviy korxona, tashkiliy-iqtisodiy mexanizm, boshqaruv, xarajatlar, strategik rejalashtirish, raqamlashtirish, innovatsiya, korporativ boshqaruv, professional menejment.Annotasiya
Ushbu maqolada oilaviy korxonalar faoliyatini boshqarishning tashkiliy-iqtisodiy mexanizmi nazariy va amaliy jihatdan tadqiq etilgan. Germaniya, Yaponiya, AQSh, Italiya va Xitoy davlatlarida shakllangan oilaviy biznes modellarining tashkiliy xususiyatlari, boshqaruv usullari, xarajatlarni boshqarish yondashuvlari, innovatsion faoliyat va davlat tomonidan qo‘llab-quvvatlash mexanizmlari qiyosiy o‘rganilgan. Tadqiqot natijasida xorijiy tajribaning O‘zbekiston sharoitida qo‘llash mumkin bo‘lgan asosiy elementlari tizimlashtirilgan. Oilaviy korxonalarda boshqaruv hisobi, raqamli monitoring, strategik xarajatlar boshqaruvi, professional menejment, avlodlar vorisligi va innovatsion moliyalashtirishni rivojlantirish bo‘yicha ilmiy-amaliy takliflar ishlab chiqilgan.
Manbalar
1. Rovelli P., Ferasso M., De Massis A., Kraus S. Thirty years of research in family business journals: Status quo and future directions. Journal of Family Business Strategy. 2022. Vol. 13(3). 100422.
2. Dinh T.Q., Calabrò A. Asian family firms through corporate governance and institutions: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2019. Vol. 21(1). P. 50–75.
3. Eddleston K.A., Kellermanns F.W., Kidwell R.E. Managing family members: How monitoring and collaboration affect extra-role behavior in family firms. Human Resource Management. 2018. Vol. 57(5). P. 957–977.
4. Herrero I., Hughes M. When family social capital is too much of a good thing. Journal of Family Business Strategy. 2019. Vol. 10(3). 100271.
5. Madison K., Daspit J.J., Turner K., Kellermanns F.W. Family firm human resource practices: Investigating the effects of professionalization and bifurcation bias on performance. Journal of Business Research. 2018. Vol. 84. P. 327–336.
6. Madison K., Holt D.T., Kellermanns F.W., Ranft A.L. Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review. 2016. Vol. 29(1). P. 65–93.
7. Michiels A., Uhlaner L., Dekker J. The effect of family business professionalization on dividend payout. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2017. Vol. 24(4). P. 971–990.
8. Yamanoi J., Asaba S. The impact of family ownership on establishment and ownership modes in foreign direct investment. Global Strategy Journal. 2018. Vol. 8(1). P. 106–135.
9. Zaman R., Jain T., Samara G., Jamali D. Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: Mapping the interface. Business & Society. 2022. Vol. 61(3). P. 690–752.
10. Robertsson H., Zellweger T., Klein M. Global Family Business Index 2023. EY and University of St.Gallen, 2023.
This work is licensed under a 